Beta 1.0.2005.1 Wednesday

Posts   
 
    
Otis avatar
Otis
LLBLGen Pro Team
Posts: 39614
Joined: 17-Aug-2003
# Posted on: 12-Sep-2005 16:06:20   

I thought I could manage to finish everything up today, but that's not going to be the case. The new graph to process queue routines (which are necessary to compact a unitofwork before serialization) were more complex than anticipated (for the nerds: Topology sorting of a directed graph, though you don't know the structure of the graph, so you have to build the graph first, and the logic now does that and constructs the topology sorted order of the graph in the same routine simple_smile )

I'm currently porting the code back to selfservicing, so there too, faster recursive saves and compact unitofwork objects (and finally correct insert/update queues simple_smile ) are a reality.

after that I'll wade through the selfservicing templates once more (and all the VB.NET templates) to see where I can remove unnecessary lines and code.

I hope to do all hardcore development today, wrap everything up tomorrow and write the readme docs and create the initial beta.

After the beta is released, I'll try to get a new templatestudio build, commandline generator and extended adapter templates done. So that will be thursday probably. I've tortured the code a lot already during the past month, so I hope this beta process will be very smooth, but you'll never know wink

Frans Bouma | Lead developer LLBLGen Pro
davisg avatar
davisg
User
Posts: 113
Joined: 27-Feb-2005
# Posted on: 12-Sep-2005 18:39:41   

Otis wrote:

I hope to do all hardcore development today, wrap everything up tomorrow and write the readme docs and create the initial beta.

Ok, you got my attention simple_smile Excited as hell here, decided to drop DB4O for the catalogue project and was waiting to see what this beta offered before I got started.

Think you said before that the beta will go to selected ppl and I will look forward to seeing it in action if i'm choosen wink ... otherwise i'll wait for the upgrade, no pressure.

Good stuff Frans.

Otis avatar
Otis
LLBLGen Pro Team
Posts: 39614
Joined: 17-Aug-2003
# Posted on: 12-Sep-2005 19:11:43   

simple_smile

The 2.0 beta will go to selected people, this is still for the 1.0 codebase, so a free upgrade (the last one) for everyone simple_smile

Frans Bouma | Lead developer LLBLGen Pro
jeffreygg
User
Posts: 805
Joined: 26-Oct-2003
# Posted on: 12-Sep-2005 20:22:25   

Otis wrote:

I'm currently porting the code back to selfservicing, so there too, faster recursive saves and compact unitofwork objects (and finally correct insert/update queuessimple_smile ) are a reality.

W00000000000000t. smile

Jeff...

davisg avatar
davisg
User
Posts: 113
Joined: 27-Feb-2005
# Posted on: 12-Sep-2005 23:54:03   

Otis wrote:

simple_smile

The 2.0 beta will go to selected people, this is still for the 1.0 codebase, so a free upgrade (the last one) for everyone simple_smile

Alright !!! smile

NickD
User
Posts: 224
Joined: 31-Jan-2005
# Posted on: 14-Sep-2005 16:46:05   

Operator overloading doesn't come until 2.0 though, correct? That looks to really reduce lines of code wink

Otis avatar
Otis
LLBLGen Pro Team
Posts: 39614
Joined: 17-Aug-2003
# Posted on: 14-Sep-2005 17:23:37   

NickD wrote:

Operator overloading doesn't come until 2.0 though, correct? That looks to really reduce lines of code wink

For the VB.NET crowd it will be available when they use .NET 2.0. For the C# using crowd, they can use it later today with .NET 1.x and the 1.0.2005.1 beta, as C# supports operator overloading in .NET 1.x, unfortunately VB.NET does not.

Frans Bouma | Lead developer LLBLGen Pro
NickD
User
Posts: 224
Joined: 31-Jan-2005
# Posted on: 14-Sep-2005 19:02:40   

Otis wrote:

NickD wrote:

Operator overloading doesn't come until 2.0 though, correct? That looks to really reduce lines of code wink

For the VB.NET crowd it will be available when they use .NET 2.0. For the C# using crowd, they can use it later today with .NET 1.x and the 1.0.2005.1 beta, as C# supports operator overloading in .NET 1.x, unfortunately VB.NET does not.

Righteous! (I'm from California - I can say things like that). I'm one of those C# guys, so it's good news for me.

alexdresko
User
Posts: 336
Joined: 08-Jun-2004
# Posted on: 14-Sep-2005 19:31:14   

You guys are totally gonna laugh at me.... After 6 years of being at the same place, I finally decide it was time to move on. Certainly there are both good and bad things related to such a huge transition, but the thing I'm going to bitch about the most is that they only use VB.NET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wonder if I jynxed myself a few posts up when I said I missed the With statement.

I've been adding ; to the end of every line since .NET 1.0 went gold... how am I to deal????

Anyway.. back to your regularly scheduled broadcast...

Otis avatar
Otis
LLBLGen Pro Team
Posts: 39614
Joined: 17-Aug-2003
# Posted on: 14-Sep-2005 23:29:52   

It's available simple_smile

Frans Bouma | Lead developer LLBLGen Pro