|
Thread subject |
Replies |
Views |
Last post |
|
Version 5.2
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
.Net upgrade
|
5 |
48 |
|
|
What Does the LLBL in LLBLGen stand for?
|
1 |
44 |
|
|
Documentation suggestion
|
1 |
47 |
|
|
Wasm - Web Assembly
|
3 |
71 |
|
|
Access to earlier versions of LLBLGen Pro
|
1 |
61 |
|
|
DbProviderFactories to be in dotnet standard 2.1
|
1 |
66 |
|
|
MSSQL to CosmosDB
|
3 |
137 |
|
|
Should we move away from LLBLGen?
|
7 |
264 |
|
|
It is Friday!
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
|
344 |
248667 |
|
|
Microsoft MVP - Licenses?
|
1 |
175 |
|
|
SQLPrompt (Intellisense) for FREE
|
4 |
5458 |
|
|
What does SD stand for?
|
2 |
258 |
|
|
Type converter for System.Object in MsAccess
|
2 |
352 |
|
|
Unity3D
|
2 |
371 |
|
|
Trial License
|
1 |
837 |
|
|
How does Codetrigger compares to LLBLGen ?
|
0 |
754 |
|
|
Hanselman takes Llblgen Pro for a spin
|
1 |
900 |
|
|
Trial for 2.6 version
|
8 |
1566 |
|
|
As stated
|
1 |
1271 |
|
|
Forum notification e-mails don't get through firewall (RDNS missing)
|
3 |
1585 |
|
|
Neet to buy version 5
|
1 |
1482 |
|
|
V5
|
1 |
1730 |
|
|
is llblgen version 2.6 compatible with .net framework 4.0
|
1 |
1718 |
|
|
Aurelia and LLBL
|
1 |
1948 |
|